The Cover-up – Part One (context)
A cover up. Yes, I know, I have repeatedly said that I do not believe there was a great world-wide conspiracy around COVID. Instead, I think that almost everything that went on can be explained by incompetence, greed and panic. Which was then stoked up by various people, for their own reasons. The World Economic Forum, for example.
I suppose you could reasonably ask, if there was no conspiracy, why the need to explain any cover up? Perhaps I should call it the ‘Great Justification’ instead. A time where the great and the good line up to tell us all that everything they did was exactly the right thing to do. Done at the right time, for the right reasons. Politicians think if you say ‘right’ three times, everyone will be convinced.
Having said this, I do think there were some quite deliberate decisions taken by those in power, cheered on by others in the background. Such as the hard lockdowns put in place by the Chinese leadership, early on.
Why did they do this? To deflect blame? To demonstrate their ability to command complete obedience from their people? To damage the West? Panic? To protect their peopl… sorry, don’t know why I even thought that.
Who knows for sure. But if China had not locked down, and hard, it seems unlikely that anyone else would have tried. Prior to COVID, the WHO put together a preparedness plan for pandemics, published in October 2019. A mere two months, or so, before COVID turned up.
When it came to lockdown measures, here are the main points:
- social distancing measures “can be highly disruptive” and should be carefully weighted
- travel-related measures are “unlikely to be successful”; “border closures may be considered only by small island nations in severe pandemics”
- contact tracing and quarantine of exposed individuals are not recommended in any circumstances.
Not exactly a ringing endorsement of lockdown. Despite this, to quote the paper ‘Are Lockdowns Effective in Managing Pandemics?’All plans were immediately abandoned without any serious discussion, at the very start.1
Evidence from previous pandemics appeared to highlight that such actions had been almost completely useless. And they came at a very high price. As we have now all seen. Not just an economic price.
It all seemed extraordinary, at least to me. Experts spent decades bringing together pandemic preparedness plans – the WHO wasn’t the only one to do so. They were all ripped up and thrown away the moment the pandemic hit. Good job.
Why?
I have been reading ‘Spike – the virus vs the people.’ By Jeremy Farrar. He is the ‘insiders’ insider. One of the very first outside China to hear about the virus. He was on first name terms with Neil Ferguson and Anthony ‘Tony’ Fauci. Best mates with Chinese virologists.
He was regularly on the phone to the WHO director-general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus – yes, I know, I know. He was also a member of SAGE – the UK Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies and head of the Wellcome Trust.
He is obviously a very hard working and well-meaning man. Equally obviously he wanted to save lives and control the spread of Sars-Cov2. I don’t think he had any ulterior motives, nor was he part of any conspiracy.
There was no wish to rule the world or turn us all into economic drones serving our billionaire masters. Whilst chewing desolately on dull vegan fare or mashed up insects.
However, what he makes very clear is that he, and his colleagues, were all desperate to lock us all down earlier, harder and more often. He believes that doing so would have saved far more lives. There is no doubt in his mind that lockdowns were highly effective … in all cases.
There is not a single sentence in his book to suggest that the measures taken may not have been effective, nor that they could have caused the slightest harm. Nothing, not a word. He thinks it was the virus, the pandemic itself, that caused massive economic problems that followed, not the actions of governments around the world.
He is also, absolutely, one hundred per cent pro-vaccine. You don’t need to read to the book to know what he thinks about COVID, and everything surrounding it. You know it already. His is the mainstream view. He would gladly do everything all over again, probably twice as hard.
Would it be possible to convince him that lockdowns did more harm than good? Not a single chance in hell. His book is a two-hundred-page justification of why the experts – such as he – were all right, all along, about everything. Him, and Neil, and ‘Tony’ et al. He blames the politicians for anything, and everything, that went wrong. Not locking down soon enough or hard enough.
I also blame the politicians, but not necessarily in the way Jeremy Farrar might think.
The point here is that all the scientific experts were, and remain, of one voice. Lockdown, lockdown, lockdown … then a little more lockdown. It would take a hell of a bold politician to tell all these experts they were wrong.
Why did they all think this would work? Because, as Farrar says early on, when the Chinese locked down in Wuhan, COVID virtually disappeared. Or so we are told. This fails to take into account the number one rule of any official information that emerges from China. Which is that you cannot, and should not, believe a single word they say, about anything.
They have a word for institutionalised lying in Russia, ‘Vranyo’. Everybody knows that everybody is lying but they all go along with it. Not sure if they have such a word in China, but they certainly should.
See under the ‘official’ COVID death count from China. This was just over five thousand, in total. This, in a country containing far more than a billion people, where COVID first started and let rip for several weeks.
In contrast the death rate in Peru was ‘reported as’ one thousand five hundred times higher. With well over one hundred thousand deaths. Discuss, without laughing. Vranyo anyone?’
Farrar does mention that Boris Johnson did try, in his rather ineffectual and wobbly way, to stand against lockdowns. In Europe, Sweden alone, remained reasonably firm – if that is the right word. Otherwise? Otherwise, we had groupthink, confirmation bias, deference to ‘experts’ and the crushing of dissenting voices. In fact, all of humanities greatest intellectual flaws were on full display, ramped up to the max.
It is a truism that all leaders are desperately keen to emphasize how keen they all are for people to think outside the box. To challenge assumptions and orthodox views. ‘Oh yes, we do, we really, really do.’
It works well in Hollywood, where the hero is usually a Maverick who gets results by breaking all the rules – whilst we cheer madly. In the real world, not so much. In fact, not at all. In the real world, what those in charge ‘really’ want, is for everyone else to shut up and do what they are damned well told. And, sadly, almost everyone does.
After the Yom Kippur war, where the Israelis were taken completely by surprise by the attack, they realised they needed a ‘tenth man’. Someone who would challenge assumptions, identify biases and spotlight inconsistencies. The devil’s advocate, if you like. A person whose role was to try and break up groupthink.
Where was our tenth man with COVID? There was, of course, no tenth man. Or if there were he, or she, was dumped in a soundproof box. When you look back on various disasters, there always is a tenth man. It’s just that no-one pays any attention to them at the time. However much they need to. ‘In science, the first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool.’
Instead, there was this thing going, and I never quite sure how to describe it, where everyone’s views converge into a mass groupthink. All dissent ignored, mocked, and ruthlessly stomped on.
If you are sitting on the outside, arms folded, determined not to converge, it can certainly look as though it is all being coordinated in some way. A worldwide conspiracy, where leaders are meeting behind closed doors to discuss their next evil moves.
Again, I don’t think it happens like that. In my mind what I see is a flock of birds that swoops and dives in perfect unison. A murmuration, a great dance in the sky. How can these birds do something so complex. How can they avoid bashing into each other, or anything else? A magical staged performance in three dimensions. Surely some intellect is controlling it all. A boffin with a remote control.
It turns out you only need three rules.
- Separation (avoiding collisions)
- Alignment (matching the direction of nearby birds)
- Cohesion (staying close to the group)
I would add a couple of others. Don’t run into sharp objects at speed, and don’t hit the ground. And, at some point, one of the birds has to decide to stop, land…I suppose. Which one, and why? [The great all-powerful controller bird?]
I believe that, in large groups, human thinking also follows the rules of a flock, pretty much:
- Avoid collisions.
- Match the direction of those around you.
- Stay close to the group.
Follow these rules, and your ideas can swoop and swirl and coordinate perfectly. A great intellectual flock. A murmuration to protect against attack.
I jest …at least I think I do.
But it does fascinate me. I have spent rather too much of my life watching the cholesterol hypothesis murmuration weave and swoop around me. I often wonder, how the experts know to say and do the same things. To utilise precisely the same arguments, even the exact same phrases. How do they manage to carefully avoid running into facts that might bring them all crashing into the ground?
With COVID, how did they all know what to say, what to think? What evidence they would accept or ignore. Which ideas to attack, or support. Who to mock? I found Sweden fascinating in this regard.
During the first wave of COVID, Sweden did not lock down. At least not in the same way as any other European country. Lockdown ‘lite’ I like to call it.
At first, the Swedish authorities were ferociously attacked from all directions by everyone. It was claimed their actions would kill hundreds of thousands, and Sweden would have the highest death rate in Europe, the world.
Then, when it began to emerge that Sweden had a lower-than-average mortality, a great and instant swooping change of direction took place.
It turns out, as everyone always – ahem – always knew, Swedish people are very socially conscious and followed strict lockdown rules anyway – without being told they had to. In fact, they locked themselves down more effectively than anyone else.
Thus, rather than contradicting the need for lockdown, Sweden provided the strongest possible evidence in support of lockdown. Tada … swoop, flock, avoid collision, match the direction of the nearby birds and stay close to the group.
Is the Swedish ‘socially conscious’ explanation true … well, that would need a few facts, and there really aren’t any. Just opinions, inflated way beyond their natural capacity to contain reality.
Many people I know became instant experts on Sweden, and how Swedish people think and act … overnight. It was fascinating to watch. Almost everyone convinced by what was, essentially, a rumour.
(One of the big claims made at this point was that Sweden’s population was spread out more thinly than the UK for example and much more rural – nonsense! It’s concentrated in Stockholm, Gothenburg, Malmo and a few other towns in a similar proportion to other European countries!)
I am not going to argue the magical thinking in use here. Just to point out that, overnight, the flock changed direction. Yesterday we all believed A. Today, we all believe B, and no-one is ever to mention A, ever again. Thank you very much. Four legs good, two legs bad.
Vaccinations and the magical swoops
Normally it takes many years to develop a new vaccine. Decades even. There are lengthy clinical trials that should be done to demonstrate efficacy and safety. To determine if good manufacturing process (GMP) is being followed.
In the case of COVID, the ‘rigorous’ trial process started in spring 2020. The first phase three trial (efficacy) was designed to finish, and report, in early 2022. As you are probably aware it didn’t last that long. It was cut short after about two months. As were all the others. Efficacy proven …
Efficacy … say what? Did any of the efficacy trials demonstrate that any lives had been saved? No, they did not. The trials were not set up to measure this, what you might consider this, somewhat important, outcome. Nor, in fact, any other hard outcome e.g. hospitalisation. But they were 95% effective at something or other. Ah yes, transmission.
Although, in the real world, it turns out they weren’t very good at preventing transmission either, not in the slightest. So, maybe the trials were not entirely robust in their reporting. One two, miss a few, ninety-nine a hundred?
Luckily, as it turns out, that doesn’t matter all, because they do much more important things, and have indeed saved millions of lives. End of discussion. ‘Will you just shut up Kendrick.’
It’s funny how many people tell me you absolutely must carry out Randomised Controlled Clinical trials to prove the efficacy – of any healthcare intervention. Because, as they tell me, observational studies cannot ‘prove’ anything. They are merely hypothesis generating. [This, by the way, is bollocks, but we shall leave that to one side for now].
Yet, when it comes to mRNA vaccines, observational studies are all we have. Thus now, it seems, mRNA observational studies are wonderful, and have absolutely proved efficacy – flock, swoop.
I do have sympathy for what happened with mRNA vaccines. Never, in the history of science, has there been so much pressure to get a vaccine out as fast as possible. Even if, in my opinion, it all seemed somewhat faster than possible?
If you ever do read ‘Spike’, at one point Farrar seems to suggest that Moderna was already working on a COVID [Sars-Cov2] vaccine in January 2020? Not sure, the passage is rather vague – deliberately?
Anway, when it came to COVID vaccines, we had six months from lab to first jab. And we are told that there were no shortcuts taken. All the required trials were done. All safety studies completed. Flock, swoop.
And the entire supply chain, with its need for -70⁰C storage was sorted out without a single problem. In parallel, a gazillion liposomes were manufactured to the highest standards, each containing a carefully measured, quality-controlled package of mRNA … with no plasmid DNA contamination. Available to billions. ‘Roll up, roll up, ladies and gentlemen and get your wonderous, absolutely safe, life-saving jab.’
If you dared suggest that this all seemed, potentially, a wee bit fast, and that corners must have been cut – as I did – you were ruthlessly attacked. You were accused of being an anti-vaxxer, and someone who fails to understand science. I think I do understand science. It is ‘The Science’ that I have problems with.
In truth, I rather liked the cleverness of mRNA technology. Although I did wonder why something so damned complicated was required. Surely, we could have created a whole bunch of genetically modified bacteria to manufacture spike proteins.
Or chicken eggs, as per influenza vaccines. I am told chicken eggs/embryos cannot be used to grow coronaviruses because chickens do not have the correct protein on their cell membranes to allow coronavirus entry. Ho hum … five seconds of research later.
‘Infectious Bronchitis Coronavirus Infection in Chickens: Multiple System Disease with Immune Suppression.’
In the early 1930s, infectious bronchitis (IB) was first characterized as a respiratory disease in young chickens; later, the disease was also described in older chickens. The etiology of IB was confirmed later as being due to a coronavirus: the infectious bronchitis virus (IBV). Being a coronavirus, IBV is subject to constant genome change due to mutation and recombination, with the consequence of changing clinical and pathological manifestations.’ 2
Oh look, it seems that chickens can get infected with coronaviruses after all. Surely some mistake. No – swoop – it is completely different – bank to the right. Different in a way I just do not have the time to explain to you, you stupid person, right now.
My view was that, if we can force mRNA into a human cell, using synthetically made liposomes to allow entry, then why not force mRNA into chicken eggs, to get them to make spike proteins. Then filter them out and use pure spike protein as a vaccine, without the need for -70⁰C transportation systems. Or the need to stick mRNA into the cells of human beings. With all the unknown safety issues that may bring. Talk about unknown unknowns.
No, we had to get our own human cells to produce spike proteins. Because? Because …. Hey, what do I know. I am not an ‘expert.’ And I don’t understand ‘The Science.’ ‘Man, who is not an expert in virology tries to ask questions about virology.’ Shock horror. He must be humiliated.
You know what I really think. I think that people out there know things about coronaviruses and spike proteins that they were not, and are not, entirely keen to tell us about. Equally, this form of mRNA/liposome cleverness is going to be the latest thing in drug delivery, so companies were very, very keen to try it out – on everyone in the world.
However, my main worry with the mRNA vaccines is that plasmid DNA was not properly removed during the mRNA refinement process, and we are all now walking about with little bits of plasmid DNA within our cells. Those of us who got vaccinated anyway. Including me, and my post-vaccine prostate cancer. Yes, I have a dog in this race.
We were initially reassured that there was no DNA contamination. We are now told that, yes of course – as we always knew – there is 3. However, it is absolutely nothing to worry about… flock, swoop. After all, it is only nanograms of material we are talking about here. What harm can a teensy, weensy, nanogram of anything do to us?
Botulism
The median lethal dose for humans has been estimated at 2 nanograms of botulinum toxin per kilogram of bodyweight. 4
It has been estimated that the total mass of Sars-Cov2 within a highly infected human being is between 1 to 100 nanograms. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is a terribly dangerous thing that can easily kill us. Whereas a few nanograms of plasmid DNA in our cells is … well that’s just fine and dandy.
Of course, it may be that plasmid DNA contamination in mRNA viruses is entirely safe. I have no idea. But I have to say the idea that many/most/all of my cells are now potentially contaminated with synthetic DNA molecules makes me somewhat uneasy. I like my DNA left very much alone, thank you very much.
We were also told that no spike proteins could get into the bloodstream after vaccination. Bong! Because, after being manufactured in the cells, the spike proteins all got stuck in cell membranes, poking out to present themselves to neutrophils (nice one, that made me laugh anyway).
Turns out that wasn’t true either. Somewhat earlier we were told the entire ‘vaccine’ injection would remain in the shoulder and never go anywhere else in the body. A concept so ridiculous that I simply sat open mouthed in wonder at such bullshit. Yes, not true either.
We were told the mRNA could not move between adjacent cells, not true. Even google AI knows this was bollocks. Here is what I got when I googled mRNA translocation between cells:
‘mRNA translocation, or the movement of mRNA between cells, is a process where cells exchange mRNA molecules, enabling the recipient cell to express the proteins encoded by the transferred mRNA. This process, which can occur through mechanisms like extracellular vesicles or direct cell-to-cell contact, allows for intercellular communication and coordination of cellular function.’
I think I knew all that long before I tried to find out what Google AI had to say. Over time, we were told so much rubbish about the COVID vaccines that I gave up believing anything they had to say. Along with many other people I suspect. Fool me once …etc.
But the flock … they all sang from the same hymn sheet. ‘Spike protein in the bloodstream bad.’ This became … ‘Spike protein in the bloodstream doesn’t matter.’ ‘Plasmid DNA in the cell nucleus doesn’t occur.’ Became … ‘Plasmid DNA in the cell nucleus doesn’t matter.’
It’s only nanograms, dontcha know. And a few measly nanograms of plasmid DNA in our cells is perfectly harmless. Maybe it is, maybe it isn’t, but you are never going to find out if you dismiss the possibility out of hand, and mock those who suggest it could carry any danger. I prefer my safety concerns to be checked out thoroughly, rather than laughed away by the grand and holy ‘experts’.
And breathe.
The dangers of the flock
Being part of a flock carries very obvious advantages when it comes to almost all human activities. Go with the flow, do what everyone else does, fit in. Move in unison. Wait till you see which way the wind is blowing before you fly off in any given direction. It is why humans have been successful. We work together to achieve great things and fend off threats.
But … the flock can be wrong. In medical research it has been, often.
And, unless you are exceedingly careful, the flock becomes a grand conspiracy of thought, that none dare question. A virtual organism which ends up highly intolerant of any criticism or independent thought. Errors are brushed aside, criticism is not accepted, however well meaning.
Those in the flock are also, in their own way, trapped. They cannot leave, for they will lose all protection, and have to survive on their own. The flock also turns on them very rapidly. From expert to dangerous conspiracy theorist in one fell swoop. Yes, you see what I did there.
The conspiracy, the ‘cover-up’, the attacks on dissent. I don’t think it is, what many believe it to be. Deliberate, potentially evil, coordinated. It is just humans doing what humans do. Grouping together, moving together, saying the same things, supporting each other. Then, when questioned, defending everything with great ferocity.
The other great problem here is that those who are not part of the flock, become ‘the enemy.’
You end up with two tribes. One tribe believing there was a great conspiracy; the other side thinking they are surrounded by utter nutcase conspiracy theorists. What dies in the middle of all this… is science.
And so, instead of attempting a calm and rational review of what went on during COVID, we have people taking up immovable positions. Everything we did was the right thing to do. Or everything they did was a disaster. The more the mainstream is attacked, the more bitterly they fight back. And vice-versa.
Humans …
Science has always been a battleground between facts and emotions. Mr Spock and Captain Kirk, the id and the superego. Some facts we love, and they make us feel good – we approve. Others we hate, and attack. COVID lies at the centre of this battleground. I attempt to sit in the middle somewhere.
The only problem with that position is that everyone, on both sides, wants you to shut up.
I am reminded of a joke that came out of the troubles in Northern Ireland. A man moves there, he is Jewish. He is confronted by an angry looking man. ‘You’re new round here, are you a Protestant or a Roman Catholic.’
‘I am a Jew.’ The man replies.
‘Well, are you a Protestant Jew, or a Catholic Jew?’
Next … the damage done by lockdowns.
1: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9368251/
2: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7598688/
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick 
Thank you! I am still swooping alone (well, I have a few friends) and happy to do so. Rather worried that the NHS are still pushing the vaccine.
Great article & thanks for taking one for the team and reading his book!
Not only were Moderna working on the vax prior to 2020, the CEO told a journalist at a conference he told his production manager that already had doses made 100k doses in 2019, but “wait till 2020 and we will make a billion doses”.
he was clearly a psychic!
A Whitney Webb article in 2020 showed in 2019 Moderna’s trials on the MRNA poison had 3 out of 4 people in their trial had side effects and 1 had heart problems.
Just like there was a conspiracy to silence you over the statins, once you realise that Covid was used to bring in the Vax, it all starts to make sense. Only a handful of players directing the theatre and the Stanley Milgram experiment was rolled out.
And why did they lie about Ivermectin? Because it was a plot to push vaccines on us.
An excellent report as usual. Hopefully those sitting on the fence will start to wake up
The trouble with you, Malcolm, is that you are so absolutely credible I can’t possibly not believe you. Why is this a problem ? – well, it is for me with regard to your cholesterol work: I cannot find anyone Downunder who thinks as you do. With regard to Covid and your marvellous analogy, it’s only going to be a problem if there’s another pandemic in my lifetime – and, happily, I doubt that.
Keep expressing your thinking, I beg: it’s so refreshing to read the output of a mind not only highly intelligent but far-reaching and combative.
🙂
Sad to read that you got the jab and, worse, had likely “side effects”.
Otherwise I concur: it doesn’t seem that it was a proper conspiracy, except IMO, love for authoritarian (totalitarian even) “solutions”. My doubt is why did the “experts”, even when knowing that lockdowns wouldn’t work and that genetic “vaccines” were a way too untested technology to administer so broadly, favored such extreme measures? Gabresselassie (WHO’s chief) himself eventually admitted that he never took the jab, why the double standards then?
No, it wasn’t a conspiracy because there was nothing secret about it but that doesn’t stop it being a conspiracy because the rationale, or if you like, the justification behind lockdowns, masking and of course the ‘vaccinations’, was withheld from us. We were presented with false reasons, eg Ferguson’s fake statistics or the suppression of data about the harms done by the vaccines, or the outright falsification of statistics, all designed to create the appearance that what was done to us, was necessary. So call it what you like but it was the state, big business and the state and corporate media creating an alternate ‘reality’ for us to live in, called the Pandemic. The reasons for this are multiple and none of them actually connected to the Coronavirus.
Nothing was secret? Why dangerous genetic splicing new technologies were experimented at such massive scale? That’s not transparent and was not allowed to be normally discussed either. Why dangerous totalitarian policies like lockdowns or the imposition of wearing masks even outdoors was enforced? That’s not transparent and oppossition to it was quelled. Why was President Magufuli of Tanzania, apparently the only cold head willing to test covid tests and radically question the official narrative led to a premature death, to put it mildly? That’s not transparent and was not really discussed. Why all the focus is on the Wuhan “clade B” as if it appeared out of the blue and not on the almost year-long travels of its precursor “clade A” in 2019 even mentioned (incl. late 2019 penumonia wave in Europe and earlier one in the USA, as well as genetic evidence for the virus being around since March 2019)?
There’s a lot of abnormal secrecy, incl. massive censorship and persecution of dissident voices, going on here.
Thank you Dr Kendrick. Another excellent report as usual. Hopefully, this ‘lite’ version of events will convince those sitting on the fence to wake up. I recommend the book ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ by RFK Jr. Full of truth with evidence and never challenged.
The truth will prevail (just takes time) and justice will be done.
I am inclined to agree with you – and yet Jeremy Farrar. Such a closed mind (if such) should not be in charge of anything. Like you I think there was something causing health problems to some people – it was exploited for purposes of control and the question is why. The mRNA vaccines seem designed to cause injury and death and again why. Once could be a mistake, but after that, why?
Here in Japan, when the news of ‘hard’ lockdowns in China was first reported, I suspected the Chinese believed they had undergone a deliberate attack from an external power and were in the process of assessing its impact, and so erring on the side of caution until they understood what the virus was and might do. The coordinated and rapid (not rabid) media dog-pile did little to change my view. I might be completely mistaken, of course.
yes, I agree. I believe that because the Chinese knew what was going on in Wuhan they assumed a leak of a potential biological weapon and thus locked down hard.
also, China is a relatively closed society so most of the MSM news is in fact third hand and possibly propaganda from Chinese dissidents. The state rarely comments particularly on negative issues.
we are unlikely to ever know the facts of what actually happened in China. However, I’m confident that the MSM reporting was predominantly politically motivated BS.
a give away sign of the politics in action was the way Trump announced that a covid pandemic had originated in China before the Chinese even knew there was a covid pandemic.
Yes, I think your observations make perfect sense if you consider the rabid anti-Chinese propaganda and actions coming out of the West that must have influenced how the Chinese govt responded to the disease. Better safe than sorry but the problem of course is that Western govts picked up the ball and ran with it. How ironic eh.
Don’t completely agree. There is fairly good evidence that the virus was circulating months before the Chinese lockdown hard in early 2020. Of course even if that is true it proves nothing by itself but in my opinion it lends evidence to either an earlier unknown release or even a deliberate bio warfare attack against China.
Hmmmmm… https://jimhaslam.substack.com/p/an-interview-with-the-german-scientist?publication_id=991852&post_id=163564196&isFreemail=true&r=tb182&triedRedirect=true
My view exactly. It is important to know that the US government has been working energetically on biological weapons since WW2, when it scooped up Japanese scientists and their work and carried them off bodily. Perhaps Germans too. Also that China has suffered a whole series of animal viruses since the 1990s – since it started to become a likely competitor or “antagonist” to the USA – which looked very much like BW attacks. When Covid began, the Chinese government may have assumed that the human population was under attack for the first time, possibly in deadly earnest. Definitely calling for the precautionary principle. Anyone remember Alastair Maclean’s “The Satan Bug”?
It’s also possible that different countries and regions suffered to different degrees simply because different viruses were released there.
Jeremy Farrar et.al. or Malcolm Kendrick et.al.?
Every time I read something you’ve written, I just ‘know’ you’re right, or more importantly, know you’re not lying – because you have no vested interest in risking harm to people, you’re prepared to think about and rationalise all sides of a conundrum and you’ve no reason (I can think of) to fib.
I get the collywobbles knowing we’ve been conned and lied to.
Keep them coming, thanks.
Excellent and thought provoking as usual. I would like to know if any reputable organisation is comparing the efficacy of mRNA vaccines against conventional vaccines. Presumably China is still using the latter, but we can’t trust any info coming out of that country. Ditto Russia. Cheerio,
Graham
Funny how Dr Kendrick and you state unequivocally that the Chinese lie about everything and we cannot trust anything they say. I have found them to be quite truthful and trustworthy. It’s our own Western governments that lie in their teeth, even when there is nothing to gain. Just to keep in practice, for example. It’s odd that so many Westerners know that very well, yet keep on believing the latest lies – that the Chinese always lie, for instance.
“Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray’s case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the “wet streets cause rain” stories. Paper’s full of them. In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know”.
– Michael Crichton, “Why Speculate?” http://larvatus.com/michael-crichton-why-speculate/
The Chinese leadership lie about everything. The Chinese are, as everywhere, much the same as everyone else.
But, Dr Kendrick, have you any credible evidence that “The Chinese leadership lie about everything”?
Moreover, your next statement, “The Chinese are, as everywhere, much the same as everyone else”, completely undermines your first.
If everyone lies, why mention that “the Chinese leadership” do?
I believe that not everyone lies. I have never noticed you tell a lie, for example. And I try not to.
It seems that the Chinese leadership denies all news that is negative about China.
Brilliant as always. Sorry about the prostate. I hear DMSO is working miracles by itself as well as a carrier of other stuff, like fenbenzadole and ivermectin. Keep on your good work, please! Branko from Slovenia (former Austro-Hungarian Empire)
it is quite interesting/worrying to read that our DNA might be changed because of the vaccines. I had to have it to visit my dad in France as he was in a nursing home and I could not cross the frontier without the blooming vaccine proof. But I do not respond to more vaccines for covid. I see people having long lasting effects all around me, such as forever colds, pains in the body, etc. Not very exciting.
Dr Kendrick has identified the root cause of the problem… it’s all because of those flocking politicians.
My personal opinion is that they tried to outdo each other. “I can lock down harder than you.” And the winner is… Jacinda Ardern.
And what a flocker she is!
I think the winner was Daniel Andrews, Premier of Victoria. We had curfews and 5km travel limits and 2 land borders to “Defend”.
I am prepared to admit that I am wrong and admit that there was much panic, greed and incompetence during the covid debacle, but relying on my gut instinct (which I have come to do often as honestly who can we believe nowadays) and living in an EU country which took things to extremes, I knew very early on that something was very ´off’. I predicted within a month or two that vaccines would be heavily pushed and that vaccine passports would be pushed. Having been at the raw end of much discrimination maybe my thinking has become warped by the trauma of living through this period.
Witnessing practically everyone I know lose their minds due to the endless psychological busing was not pretty either and doesn’t bode well for a replay of covid.
I look at Event 201 and wonder. I look at the way that things have changed since covid and how countries have not removed their emergency laws and at how authoritarian many have become and find it hard to believe that any of it was about health – more an exercise in just how much control people will put up with if scared enough.
Anyway at 66 I decided not to go anywhere near the jabs. I had an extremely mild dose of covid and took Ivermectin. As far as I’m aware, I’ve never had it again. I have no regrets and being somewhat of a conspiracy theorist served me well I believe.
I think that the flock feels threatened by the thought They might have taken the wrong decision. I did not take the jab in Sweden but was met with contempt because of my anti social behavior. I consequently correcten those WHO called me anti vaxxer. I have always seen myself as the controllgroup. You know the group they use When testing the drug for efficacy and toxicity or …..
Thank you for another thought provoking essay. Your use of the flock metaphor reminded me of a book I read a long time ago as a student and young man, Johnathan Livingston Seagull by Richard Bach, first published in the UK in 1972. Bach was a US airforce pilot. It is a fantastic extended metaphor of how an individual seagull seeks to excel in the science of flight, but the group, the flock, see him as a heretic going against how they have always lived, and disown him. In the end he comes back and leads a band of like minded gulls away and into another dimension. Leaving the flock living their hum drum day to day lives. There is also a touch of the story of the messiah in there. It is only a short book, but so full of rich visions of the human condition. I highly recommend reading it as it is such a lovely story and so evocative of the human condition and will provide for a biut of escapism in the mad world we currently inhabit. Indeed, I have just taken it from my bookshelves and will reread today as a reminder of a simpler time in my life.
Thanks for reminding me of this book. I read it many years it go but I am sure I will get a lot more out of it if I read it again now with everything I have learnt in the intervening years.
I have one outlook on this and one theory.
My outlook is that science is more often wrong than it’s right, otherwise there would be no need for experiments. We would just move straight from Hypothesis to completed Theory at the command of a scientist. Just one on any given subject.
My theory is that the good and the great understood exactly what was going on at the WIV. Almost every country has a ‘secret’ biological experimentation lab somewhere. They are not developing novel knitting patterns at Porton Down. And the WIV was, at least in part, funded with western money.
When it was recognised a virus had accidentally escaped no one had a clue how dangerous it was, but they all knew how potentially dangerous it was. After all, it was being developed to produce vaccines that would stop biological attacks by enemies in it’s tracks. China has been, of course, the bogie man enemy of the west for about 50 years so it makes complete sense to collaborate with them to develop a vaccine to counter a bio weapon they would develop………
Whatever. The balloon went up amongst the scientists/politicians that this could be as bad as we could possibly imagine and every politician and scientist hit the panic button. They might be, after all, blamed for this if anyone cottoned onto what they were up to in the WIV, so the digital shredders were put to good use immediately.
The lockdowns, social distancing, masks, quarantines – everything, were designed for one reason only – so politicians and scientists could say ‘we did everything possible to save lives’. They knew it wouldn’t work, they just wanted to create the illusion they were in control.
With respect, your theory is merely a hypothesis; and you appear to have completely ignored your “one outlook” because you have jumped straight from Hypothesis to completed Theory.
Worth reading Wilful Blindness. In the book they have the case of the vermiculate mine in Libby, Montana, USA. With that the miners were breathing in asbestos particles and dying. Not only that but they brought the particles home. It was in the playgrounds, the homes, the schools. Family members including children were breathing it in. Everybody. The company management new about. The local politicians new about it. The company doctors new about it. What is interesting is that a journalist new there was something was up, and started investigating, but only ever received hostility, mainly from family members effected by it. A bit of a clue might have been that half of you town is on oxygen and is dying. Anyway, eventually the dam burst. Today it is known about, but new cases are still coming forward, but the mine started in 1919. That is over a century of something going wrong.
Thank you, as always, for your rationality, clarity and courage.Lynda MorganSent from my iPad
Dr Kendrick – yet again I am deeply impressed by your reasoned insight and moral courage. I love reading your articles and as a non medic just hope more of the medical profession can withstand the pressure to conform to groupthink – and actually investigate further themselves when things don’t make sense. I look forward to part 2.
“Those of us who got vaccinated anyway. Including me, and my post-vaccine prostate cancer. Yes, I have a dog in this race.”
Oh dear. Best wishes with that.
wrt conspiracy theory, I agree that much can be put down to greed, panic and stupidity- but I also know that there was a lot of control by military psychology ops and nudge units – it was definitely effective. Bastards.
I don’t see how one can be aware of SPI-B and Event 201 and not see psychological malfeasance relying on massive propaganda and lies and coercion.
The “Players” at Event 201 were cat’s paws of those higher up who made the decisions.
I am presently preparing a statement intended for submission to the UK Covid-19 Public Inquiry to the effect that the extent ion the global mortalities observed over the duration of the pandemic cannot be attributed to the coronavirus. This is result of the application of simple logic. Only persons suffering from enfeeblement of immune system potency became sufficiently ill so as to pose a threat to the continuance of their lives. Those [ersons with fully functioning immune systems could contain the contagion of the infective agent among their cells so as to suffer only relatively mild symptoms or even remain fully asymptomatic. That is a depiction of real-world simultaneous equation that can be resolved algebraically to expose the truth that the malaise of immune compromise has been responsible for a global tally of 25 million excess deaths, or even more. In sweeping terms, and stretching the meaning of ‘pandemic’ more than is normal, the devastation resulting in association with the spread of coronavirus has been the result of the dire to which individuals suffer the malaise of immune compromise and the prevalence of this malaise within the worlds population.
While-ever hey opinion leaders hark on about the need to improve the state of preparedness for the next pandemic that they direct will arrive sooner as opposed to later the one level of preparedness most in need of bolstering and improving is the efficacy of the innate immune system among westernised humans. The phenomenon of enfeeblement has reached epidemic proportions throughout all of the westernised and developed world for reasons that the cause it is also commonplace among modern westernised living standards.
As much about this is concerning and even scary the foremost cause is also reversible. Theory can now direct that enfeeblement of interfacial water within and about cells can enfeeble enzymatic and dendritic type actions, among other affairs, and enfeeblement of these actions enfeebles both the capacity of the body to uprate production of counter-viral cells (counter-pathogenic cells) in any time of infection and the capacity of counter-pathogenic cells to phagocytose pathogenic particles or virions.
Fortunately, in the case of enfeeblement of interfacial water resulting from its foremost cause mass and volume can be restored to interfacial water about requisite places. This is a very summary account of how a trial of a particular intervention by Haider Abdul-Lateef Mousa gave rise to such encouraging results. [1]
It also explains how the prevalence of hypertension (be it clinical or sub-clinical) among modern westernised populations would be a most excess surrogate means to asses the prevalence of immune compromise among the same peoples.
1: https://faculty.uobasrah.edu.iq/uploads/publications/1667582463.pdf
Dr Kendrick, this blog lacks title thus it is not clickable from your main site.
I needed to check source in order to enter this blog site (https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2025/04/17/29896/)
Will have a look when I get back home
It used to be with WordPress, that if you forgot to add the title, WordPress would automatically grab the first few words and insert them into the title box. Alas no more, another brilliant WordPress ‘improvement’.
As so often these days, plus ca change, plus ca devient pire.
Hah! I find the new, ‘improved’ admin interface for editing posts, completely and totally incomprehensible and don’t use it. Thankfully, I think due to pressure from users, they’ve kept the ‘Classic’ interface but even so, wherever the two overlap, chaos ensues.
The blogger John Ward (he’s in his late 70s) had much trouble with WordPress censoring his site. He recently moved to https://therealslog.ghost.io
WordPress censoring his site? Well that’s a new one to me and I’ve been using WP for over 15 years and amongst the endless problems I have with the software, censorship isn’t, so far anyway, one of them.
There are new crisp flavours that get more rigorous testing than the COVID vaccine, yet, nothing to see here folks, roll your sleeves up.
Thanks Dr. Kendrick..as usual as close to reality as I think anybody can get these days. All the best Roger Murphy P.S Read all yer books !
>
Great post, although personally I’m not convinced that there isn’t some malevolent intent higher up the chain though, and that many “lower down” just carry out (through ignorance, stupidity or willful blindness) what they’re told to do and go along with it. As a former diagnostic radiographer and, later, medical secretary, I have observed this in the medical field where many nurses and other “assistants” truly believe that they are “doing the right thing” without asking any questions when delivering certain interventions. In fact, they seem to be the MOST zealous in that respect and cannot entertain any dialogue that might upset their beliefs.
However, being an individual who has always been curious and questioned things that didn’t make sense to me, I have found that going up that chain to the doctor (but, interestingly, NOT to consultant level!) I have had far more proper debate with them than with their lackeys. The way people like Bill Gates manage to get their fingers in so many pies (the medical field, the MSM, agriculture, climate change etc) and, as a result, seem to be able to influence government policies and the thoughts of the everyday people, is very worrying to me. The “pandemic” seems to have been an exercise in compliance to see how far “they” can get, how much control “they” can have and, yes, how much richer “they” can get at the expense of us plebs.
interesting thoughts, thank you.
Jeremy farrar was within the early jan 2020 Tony crew debunking the lab leak. Let’s call them “the conspiracy to label others conspiracy theorists”. I recall he was active editor of the first letter on the topic, lancet or nature. Classic russian tactics; blame others for what you are doing.
Bet that you do not anything on this in his book?
JR
So those of us who kept our heads and didn’t get ‘vaccinated’, does that mean we have not been contaminated with synthetic MRNA, or spike proteins or whatever else junk they have been sticking into most of us?
But Malcolm, you’re kidding yourself surely? They used classic nudge techniques: fear, more fear, change the rules all the time till everybody had their panic mode raised to the max. And the who
Yes, incompetent group think, absolutely. *ahem* “Build Back Better”
It is the mass ego that constructs dogmas and laws; for while the individual soul is, if free at all, self poised, the mass mind is always uncertain, driven by vague, wandering aims; conscious in a dim fashion of its own weakness, it builds around itself a grotesque structure in the everlastingness of which it implicitly believes. When each unit of humanity merges itself in the mass, it loses its bearings and must rely on externals. The whole effort of evolution is to the development of individual souls who will dare to be free of the architecture of crowd morality.
For when man is herded, he remembers the savage.
Mary Webb, The House in Dormer Forest, 1920
Jeremy Farrar is deep state his background is a give away and he belongs in prison for what he did.to promote the use of experimental product Listen to his misinformation on Desert Island Discs from 2020 Are you aware the Pfizer product authorised on 2nd december 2020 was not tested in humans before authorisation? There were 2 process products P1 for the trial and P2 for distribution. P2 was cultured in escherichia coli whoch produces endotoxin MHRA told us P2 was not tested in humans and only tested in vitro https://web.archive.org/web/20201216233459/https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/summary-public-assessment-report-for-pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine Wellcome told us the authrosed product was tested in humans, I cannot believe Farrar was unaware of this as he was an expert in typhoid fever and salmonella toxicity https://wellcome.org/news/safety-first-how-run-covid-19-vaccine-clinical-trial here are some Farrar comments on typhoid https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2876576/ The epidemiology of Salmonella infections is changing. Jeremy Farrar reported a dramatic decline in the overall incidence of typhoid fever in Vietnam in recent years, suggesting that eradication of this disease might be within reach. This reduction is not the result of a specific typhoid fever control program but rather a consequence of economic development and improved sanitation, paralleling the decline in typhoid fever in the United States during the early 20th century. He is an expert in bacterial infection and has written about the power of harm from bacterial infection including salmonella enterica whoch produces endotoxin Abstract One of the most serious complications of typhoid fever is intestinal perforation. Of 27 patients admitted to a provincial hospital in the Mekong Delta region of Vietnam who had gastrointestinal perforation secondary to suspected typhoid fever, 67% were male, with a median age of 23 years and a median duration of illness of 10 days. Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serotype Typhi (S. Typhi) was isolated from 11 (41%) of 27 patients; of 27 patients, only 4 (15%) had positive cultures from gut biopsies. S. Typhi DNA was detected by polymerase chain reaction for all perforation biopsy samples. Detailed histological examination of the gastrointestinal mucosa at the site of perforation in all cases showed a combination of discrete acute and chronic inflammation. Acute inflammation at the serosal surface indicated additional tissue damage after perforation. Immunohistochemical results showed that the predominant infiltrating cell types at the site of perforation were CD68+ leukocytes (macrophages) or CD3+ leukocytes (T lymphocytes). https://academic.oup.com/cid/article-abstract/39/1/61/316705 So it is highty likely he knew the pfizer P2 would create endotoxin harms in my view
Your analogy of a ‘murmuration’…..what is that you are downplaying in your circuitous essay ? It was all somehow politicians/ medics/people mass forming a response with, as you acknowledge, some deliberation by those ‘at the top’?
I find your premise naive in many respects Dr K. It is an analysis some may be much more comfortable with on digesting your arguments. Long live free speech and opinion.
How many impossible things can an average person believe before breakfast? It was all so …illogical. Ah, well.
Just a flock of starlings ?
https://joannenova.com.au/2025/04/nothing-says-safe-and-effective-like-destroying-all-the-data-from-australias-giant-abandoned-vaccine-study/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=nothing-says-safe-and-effective-like-destroying-all-the-data-from-australias-giant-abandoned-vaccine-study
I’m gonna write it down for you. Ultimately, most human beings are cowards. Whether physically or intellectually.
Malcolm, you call it a vaccine. The mRNA thing has a name already – transfection. In 2020, we’d had over 20 years of expertise with transfection already, with an extensive commercial infrastructure well established. From there, it was a simple matter of ramping up existing production and distribution. This then permits to make appear, or at least to suppose, as if the otherwise necessary research, study and testing was done extraordinarily quickly.
Humans is a social species, not a flock species, not a hive species. This means the human tribe is determined by each individual’s personal interest, rather than by some overarching single purpose. A hypothetical clarifies. Suppose there’s a show this weekend. Why isn’t everyone going? Why isn’t only one going? If flock, then everyone. If hive, then only one.
Social species are driven to form herds, tribe in humans. We possess a biological prime mover I call the herd formation effect. The effect was discovered by Temple Grandin (I don’t know what she calls it). It’s modulated by recognition of friend or foe. If friend, then calm or euphoria. If foe, then anxiety or anguish.
It’s possible to direct calm or euphoria, because the force is attractive. It’s not possible to do same with anxiety or anguish, because the force is repulsive. The maximum size of a tribe is determined by the individual’s capacity to know this many other individuals intimately. Any bigger and strangers begin to appear, leading ultimately to the tribe splitting into two tribes, each formed by respective members of family, which then drives the two tribe’s members to maintain friendly status with each other.
It’s much more complex – i.e. dominance hierarchy, apex species, tools, complex social, trade, guilds, morality, civility – so I’ll stop here. My point is sufficient for the contention. Humans is not a flock nor hive species. We do not drive straight off the cliff by murmuration.
Martin Levac
While I agree that humans generally are tribal, I think Dr K is on to something with his flock theory. The difference is the variation between humans is much greater than the variation between birds in a flock; but the variation between humans in similar professions at a similar level, such as between senior politicians, or between top executives, or between Wall Street hedge fund managers, is much less than the general human variation and approaches the variation between birds in a flock, so within these specialized groupings behavior tends more to flocking than to tribal.
Getting an mRNA jab always seemed to me to be like catching a virus. Isn’t that what they do, hijacking the cell’s machinery to make the products they want? Of course most of us don’t want to catch a virus but it happens all the time so I was not unduly worried about taking the vaccine. At my age the disease is supposed to be a bigger risk than side effects of the vaccine. But I have also had Covid itself and it wasn’t that bad, so perhaps I didn’t really need the vaccine after all. Too late now.
I’m curious – did you read this, or do minds think alike ? https://www.hughwillbourn.com/post/23-cock-up-conspiracy-or-murmuration from August 21. Other posts explain other parts of the mechanism ….
I’m an unashamed conspiracy theorist. My mantra for the past few years has been “ If there was really something to fear, why did Downing Street throw parties?” Not the usual line of “one rule for us, another rule for them” but the apparent total lack of fear and dread that leads a lot of us to assume “they” knew that there was nothing to worry about.
Don’t label yourself as a ‘conspiracy theorist’…you are just one of the many who observed what the government was doing/saying in contradiction of what was actually happening on the ground.
To me, the biggest clue that it was a plot is that they lied about Ivermectin.
That was necessary to get EUA for the vaxx. EUA cannot be granted if another treatment is available, so they lied to discredit Ivermectin.
Doctors had their licences revoked and their careers destroyed for saving lives with Ivermectin. People who thought they were doing their best to to save lives would not have done that to doctors who were saving lives.
There were so many clues for us to pick up. They were trying hard to see who would spot them. Some people seemed to have missed them all. I did a test paper for them as an article on my site.
Great post, as usual. It fully agrees with my interpretation that I published here:
https://senecaeffect.substack.com/p/slaying-a-tiny-dragon-the-origins
although from a different viewpoint.
Can I translate your post into Italian for my blog?
Feel free
https://ugobardi.substack.com/p/linsabbiamento-parte-prima-il-contesto — And thanks!!!
I like the murmuration analogy.
Coincidentally, today Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson’s substack posted a guest article about the same subject. https://trusttheevidence.substack.com/p/requiem-for-journalism
Excellent article as always, thank you Dr Kendrick. Very sad to read about your prostate cancer, I hope you got it early and everything is under control. Mark Lintern, author of the Cancer Resolution has a very interesting theory on cancer that addresses all 10 of Hanahan and Weinberg`s hallmarks of cancer – a lot based on the work of Professor Thomas Seyfried.
Around about 2 weeks after the 2nd COVID vaccination (taken only under great pressure), I developed a rash/lesions all over my body – it took almost 2 years to get under control – life was an absolute misery (hitherto unknown MCAS was diagnosed). All my blood markers pointed to inflammation (High: IGE (1000), CRP (which reduced on high dose B6), IL6, CCP-AK, D-Dimer, ferritin, HDL (120), low transferrin. Four years later these markers have not improved. Then a month ago, I had an NSTEMI, age 56. I was told in the hospital I needed to take 40 mg Sortis and 10 mg Ezetemibe and that for someone in my position (which is no high RR, BMI of 22, no metabolic disease, no narrowed arteries or plaques, no stents required in my heart – cardio angiogram – fit and eat a low carb diet), my LDL should be 55!! It is usually about 120, but was 143 in the hospital – still within “range” however.
Having read your brilliant book The Clot Thickens, I of course refused the cholesterol lowering meds and opted for just the aspirin. Now awaiting a cardio-MRI but I am wondering if all the chronic inflammation from the you know what caused the NSTEMI…
Thank you, Dr. Kendrick. Sorry to hear about your post-vaccine prostate cancer.
After two Moderna shots and a bout with covid from which I recovered well, I subsequently took 3 Moderna boosters which soon led to a diagnosis of Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis and severe CAD (CAC score 1500). From never sick before to never well after the vaccine, with the latest insult being a disabling case of AIPD (Guillain-Barre). Much to investigate with respect to the MRNA technology.
Of my four siblings only the two who took no vaccines remain free of lingering health concerns and quite uncertain whether they ever had Covid-19.
Good luck.
F#ck the Jeremy Farrars of the world. If they try this bullshit again I won’t be as nice as I was the first time around. Being the nice person I am I spent way too much time writing about how idiotic they were in hopes they would catch a clue but I understand at best I was only convincing the fence sitters. Next time there will be a different approach.
Those in control acted in a co-ordinated manner because it was co-ordinated and orders went out. Working in a hospital for me, at least was proof of that. Day 1 – people from Italy rocking up at A&E, given some tests with virtually absent infection control, positive cases, asymptomatic, placed in ward bays marked out by tape. I thought we might have a problem so challenged management….”Public Health England Says” was the reply. Day ZERO and everything changed and the lies and psychological mayhem began, the hospital emptied, no ambulances arrived because everyone was scared to come in (or they tried phoning 999 and gave up because the phones weren’t answered)….I could go on.
Oh and the morgue, never full during the P word, yet record deaths?? But now, this week, wards rammed, morgue rammed….
I’ll stop now.
Brilliant work. Thank you so much for exploring the Why? of covid.
Here’s a fun fact you may not be aware of:
Event 201 took place on October 18, 2019 in NYC. For some strange reason, NYC was hit far harder by the virus than anywhere else in the US, including the boroughs next door to NYC that had no rise in deaths.
The 7th CISM Military World Games were held in Wuhan October 18-27, 2019. Many believe that athletes returning home spread the virus around the world.
Some believe the athletes or people accompaning them took the virus to Wuhan.
I examined the background of the “Players” who ran Event 201. Key among them was Avril Haines, who had been Deputy Director of the CIA and NSA.
But I’m sure that the pand* codswallop was just done by a flock of birds.
Some of the extreme response might have been well-meaning, but there’s no doubt that some bad actors were keen to take advantage for their own agendas – shall we say, those who might have had a predisposition to favour repressive and totalitarian views.
Professor Norman Fenton wrote on his blog on 22 July 2020:
“Norman was one of four …. academics to take part in this panel session today.It was a disturbing experience as it revealed just how politicised the pandemic had become and, indeed, how it seemed to be part of a grander scheme for more worldwide authoritarian control….. Four months into the ridiculous lockdowns and these other academics were talking about the ‘opportunity for a Great Reset using the exact same terminology as Klaus Schwab of the World Economic forum and other world leaders. Not just here, but also talking to other academic colleagues was clear that many were salivating over lockdowns – openly praising them for their effect on ‘reducing carbon emissions’ and demanding that such lockdowns continue even if Covid-19 was defeated. it seems that Covid-19 lockdowns are going to be the precursor for climate lockdowns …
“Academics (almost exclusively on the extreme left politically) have played a key role in pushing the Government into the extreme restrictions and lockdowns … These academics … are now leading the attack on these civil liberties. I future years people will look back on this time as one of total shame for academia.”
I’ll see Dr Kendrick’s quotations from “1948” and raise this:
“He paused, and for a moment assumed again his air of a schoolmaster questioning a promising pupil: ‘How does one man assert his power over another, Winston?’
“Winston thought. ‘By making him suffer,’ he said.
“‘Exactly. By making him suffer. Obedience is not enough. Unless he is suffering, how can you be sure that he is obeying your will and not his own? Power is in inflicting pain and humiliation. Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing’”.
– George Orwell (O’Brien to Winston Smith, “1984”)
Now ask yourself this: how do you put a person even more in your power than by enslaving him? How do you make him suffer more effectively, profoundly, and inescapably than by infiltrating every cell in his body with insidious poisons? How could you possibly have more power over him than by taking over and subverting the very biochemistry of his nucleic acids?
Thanks, Dr. Kendrick. You’re always fun to read. One aspect you may not be aware of is that the mRNA vaccines were part of a Pentagon biological-threat countermeasures program, and they (the Pentagon) had full custody of all the lots until delivery. A conspiracy by definition, since it involved more than one person, and all of them buried deep in the bowels of the Military-Industrial-Congressional-Banking complex. You bet CIA and MI6 were involved, too.
Yah. It’s been my observation that whenever governments talk about “defence” against BW, they really mean preparation for attack. Look at Porton Down: is it really dedicated to protecting us against the fiendish plots of foreigners? And if so why did it originate such charming products as VX nerve gas? How does that “protect” anyone?
Craig Murray had what I consider the ultimate comment on the Skripal farce:
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/07/wheel-out-the-skripal-story-again/
I don’t know how to paste a picture into this blog software, but if you read that article by Mr Murray, be sure to scroll down one page to see the map and his sardonic comment.
Quite worthy of Dr Kendrick, IMHO.
A great read as always. But incompetence, greed and panic doesn’t explain how they managed to score a perfect 100% wrong in every action. And the flock changing direction in unison on a sixpence is because they were all watching and consuming the same bullshit “news” programs and listening to the same celebrity influencers-turned-expert in things diseases. All easily controlled by the central planners of the whole psyop.
Don’t underestimate how totally tuned-in the brainwashed were/are to every word, nuance, frown, change in body language carefully broadcasted to them. I never directly switched on any mainstream TV program or read any newspaper during the period (unless it was specifically being shown by someone making a point), but I knew exactly the simple, coordinated, repeated messages that were being emanated and were virtually impossible to escape from.
Did you ever read the Guidance on the gov.uk website? The man hours taken to craft the nonsense must have been considerable. I did my own satirical take.
Hi Dr. Kendrick I wonder why you did not mention that Anthony ‘Tony’ Fauci admitted that everything he ever said about Covid 19 was a massive lie and cover-up? He deserves to be in prison. Best to you and yours Colin
Um, where did he admit this? Would be most interesting
At one point in the hearing, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R.-Ga., held up an enlarged copy of the Daily Mail headline and said, “Mr. Fauci, you also represent the type of science where you confessed that you made up the COVID rules, including 6-feet social distancing and masking of children.”
“I never said I made anything up,” Fauci said.
“You admitted that you made up, that you made it up as you went,” Greene said.
“I didn’t say I made it up,” Fauci said.
“So, are you saying this is fake news, Mr. Fauci?” Greene asked.
“I didn’t say I made anything up,” Fauci said.
“What did you say?” Greene asked.
“I said that it is not based in science and it just appeared,” Fauci said.
Dr. M.
I thought I had read it in one of your books however the above is from POLITIFACT-THE POYNTER INSTITUTE And below is from the DAILY MAIN-(Apologies)
Daily Mail, REVEALED: Dr. Anthony Fauci confesses he ‘made up’ covid rules including 6 feet social distancing and masking kids, June 2, 2024 (archived)
As an aside, did you ever have any comeback re the story in Doctoring Data that in certain circumstances the MMR jab can cause Autism as in thyroid disfunction?
All the best
Regards, always
Colin
Hello again Dr.
Is any of the following of any use?
Jim Rickards is a lawyer and investor who hates Biden, the climate change idiots and Covid 19 speak.
All the best
Colin
II. FDA Is Making COVID Shots an Annual Event. They Ignore Deadly Side Effects.
Jim Rickards
We’ve all just lived through a three-year nightmare of forced COVID gene therapy injections, useless masks, lockdowns that destroyed the economy, and social distancing that serves no purpose. The SARS-CoV-2 virus (which causes COVID) is airborne and respiratory. It goes where it wants. Masks are useless because the virus is far smaller than the mask’s weave. Lockdowns don’t work; they just force people into close quarters where the virus spreads easily. It’s much healthier to be outside getting sun, fresh air, and exercise with no mask. That’s the opposite of what the government forced people to do. Six-foot social distancing had no scientific basis at all. The idea came from a 19th-century German scientist who admitted in his own writings that he had no idea if it works. It doesn’t. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centres for Disease Control (CDC) like to claim that there was no national vaccine mandate. That’s a lie. The “vaccine” is not even a vaccine. It does not stop infection, and it does not stop the spread of the virus. It’s actually an experimental gene modification therapy. We’re now getting more data from around the world showing the deadly harm caused by mRNA injections. These gene therapies train the body to respond to COVID. In doing so, the body loses the ability to respond to every other pathogen. Your immune response system becomes a one-trick pony that cannot fend off other infections. We’re seeing a wave of deaths from pneumonia, pulmonary edema, myocarditis (heart attacks), thrombosis (that can cause strokes), and many other diseases that in the aggregate resemble the AIDS pandemic of the 1980s. (Fauci was involved with AIDS also). Now evidence is emerging that the mRNA injections break down the DNA replication process in the body which leads to gene mutations and cancer. The military was forced to take the injections. Government contractors were forced to take the injections. International travelers were forced to take the injections. Airline pilots were forced to take the injections. Worst of all, millions of perfectly healthy children and college students were forced to take the injections in a form of ritual child abuse. The result will be millions more statistical “excess deaths” as the heart attacks, lung collapses, strokes and cancers caused by the mRNA treatments stack up. Does the FDA admit any of this? No, they’re hiding evidence and fudging the numbers. Now they’re proposing the ultimate outrage. As reported here, the FDA plans to make the “vaccine” shots (actually mRNA treatments) an annual regimen. Haven’t they killed enough people already? Apparently not. This is not just a humanitarian issue; it’s an enormous drag on U.S. productivity and economic growth. Let’s hope the new Congress and the new free-speech version of Twitter can get the truth out there and hold some people accountable. Above all, stop the vaccine madness.
West Hartford, Connecticut
February 10, 2023
Editor’s note: Dr. Fauci was a loud advocate for the experimental mRNA vaccines designed to defeat COVID. But he just put his name to study demonstrating that the vaccines largely failed. What’s going on? Today, Jeffrey Tucker breaks it all down for you.
JEFFREY
TUCKER
Dear Peter,
What if Dr. Anthony Fauci co-authored an article on vaccines that would have gotten you and me blocked and banned at any point in the past three years? That just happened.
His article in Cell —“Rethinking Next-Generation Vaccines for Coronaviruses, Influenzaviruses and Other Respiratory Viruses”—states it as plainly as possible: The COVID-19 vaccine didn’t work because it couldn’t work.
First some review from what we knew before this whole fiasco began.
Vaccines aren’t suitable for coronaviruses. Such respiratory viruses spread and mutate too quickly. This is why there has never been a vaccine for the common cold and why the flu shot is predictably suboptimal.
Vaccines can only be sterilizing and contribute to public health when the virus is a stable pathogen, such as smallpox and measles. For coronaviruses, there’s really only one way forward: better antivirals, therapeutics and acquired immunity.
The above paragraph has been repeated to me countless times in my life, especially after COVID-19 hit. Every expert was on the same page. There was simply no question about it. Anything that would be called a vaccine would lack the features of vaccines past. It wouldn’t stop infection or transmission, much less end a bad season for respiratory viruses.
This is why the Food and Drug Administration has never approved one. It wouldn’t and couldn’t make it through trials, especially given the safety risks associated with every vaccine.
Maybe, maybe, there exists the possibility that you can come up with one variant, but it isn’t likely to be approved in time to be effective. It might provide temporary protection against severe outcomes from one variant, but it will be useless against further mutations.
In addition, vaccine-induced protection isn’t as broad as natural immunity, so it’s likely that the person would get infected later. Boosting is likely only to pertain to last month’s mutation and raises dangers of itself: imprinting the immune system in ways that make it less effective.
Saying the Truth Would Have Gotten You Banned
Sadly, posting those three paragraphs on social media at any point in the past three years would likely get you censored or even banned. Normal science was suppressed. Common knowledge among experts was verboten. Everything we’ve learned for a century or even two millennia was thrown out.
The job of censorship was tasked to a gaggle of ill-educated tech workers obeying the FBI overlords, so they went along.
And here we are two years after the vaccine rollout and the truth is rather well known. The vaccines were an enormous flop. At best.
As former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson notes, “We now have two years of real-world data on the mRNAs, based on billions of doses. Putting side effects aside, they work extremely well against Covid – for about four months after the second dose.”
So there’s that. But Berenson continues:
“After that, their effectiveness rapidly wanes. It falls to zero against coronavirus infection and transmission within a few months. In fact, we have increasing evidence that it eventually turns negative – that vaccinated people are MORE likely to get COVID repeatedly than the unvaccinated.”
So they tried to mandate these things for everyone and to ruin the lives of those who refused — all for an experimental product that works for about four months after the second shot, but later makes it even more likely that the vaccinated will get COVID than the unvaccinated.
At worst, the vaccines caused tremendous amounts of injury and death as compared to any vaccine ever approved for the market. That they were forced on people in many professions — and backed by a Stalinesque media frenzy — is simply incredible.
Several cities even locked themselves down for the vaccinated only. Even now, unvaccinated non-Americans can’t travel to the United States, unless they come across the southern border.
Is Fauci “Trolling” Critics?
And yet only now does Fauci choose to lay out the science that we knew long ago. There’s nothing particularly interesting in his article. Only the timing is interesting: following trillions in pharma profits and millions displaced by mandates and suffering from injury all over the world.
Now he says that there was really no chance that the vaccine would be either effective or necessarily safe. This is a level of trolling that’s truly unthinkable and indescribable. Here’s the summary of the article:
“Viruses that replicate in the human respiratory mucosa without infecting systemically, including influenza A, SARS-CoV-2, endemic coronaviruses, RSV, and many other ‘common cold’ viruses, cause significant mortality and morbidity and are important public health concerns. Because these viruses generally do not elicit complete and durable protective immunity by themselves, they have not to date been effectively controlled by licensed or experimental vaccines.
“In this review, we examine challenges that have impeded development of effective mucosal respiratory vaccines, emphasizing that all of these viruses replicate extremely rapidly in the surface epithelium and are quickly transmitted to other hosts, within a narrow window of time before adaptive immune responses are fully marshalled.”
There are profound safety issues to consider, too. It takes a very long time to assure that. Fauci wrote:
“Considering that vaccine development and licensure is a long and complex process requiring years of preclinical and clinical safety and efficacy data, the limitations of influenza and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines remind us that candidate vaccines for most other respiratory viruses have to date been insufficiently protective for consideration of licensure …”
Further, vaccines certainly can’t improve on what even natural immunity can’t do:
“Taking all of these factors into account, it is not surprising that none of the predominantly mucosal respiratory viruses have ever been effectively controlled by vaccines. This observation raises a question of fundamental importance: if natural mucosal respiratory virus infections do not elicit complete and long-term protective immunity against reinfection, how can we expect vaccines, especially systemically administered non-replicating vaccines, to do so?”
This is why the flu vaccines “have never been able to elicit durable protective immunity against seasonal influenza virus strains, even against non-drifted strains. … Their effectiveness against clinically apparent infection is decidedly suboptimal, ranging from 14 percent to 60 percent over the past 15 influenza seasons.”
The Vaccines Were a Flop — But They Saved “Innumerable” Lives?
Now, it’s not as if Fauci admits that the vaccine was a complete flop. Of course, he has to engage in the usual incantations of the glories of the COVID-19 vaccination.
“During the COVID-19 pandemic, the rapid development and deployment of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines has saved innumerable lives and helped to achieve early partial pandemic control,” he wrote.
Note the word “innumerable.” It means there’s no number and no possibility of a number. Exactly. Also note “early partial”—weasel words to cover the reality of egregious failure.
If you click through the citation to this dubious claim, it’s from April 2021, early in the mutation process, when we hardly had any data at all to justify such celebration. Why is Fauci citing a two-year-old piece in defense of the vaccine?
Because that’s all there is to cite: two-year-old sources without meaningful data.
How precisely can we account for this fiasco? If they knew, and they did know, how is it that they put us through this horrible upheaval?
The most dreadful theory is that they knew for sure that the virus would become endemic through exposure. But the point of “slowing the spread” and “flattening the curve” (lockdowns and masking) while trashing and nearly banning other therapeutics was to preserve the customer base for the new experimental product.
That product was mRNA, which is supposed to be a platform for future vaccines. This is why the Johnson & Johnson vaccine was taken off the market.
They Treated Us Like Lab Rats
Under this theory, they wanted to prolong the pandemic for as long as possible so they could collect data on how well the vaccine worked. And they wanted to try it universally, which is why we didn’t hear much at all about the risk gradient of the vaccine itself. This also accounts for the deliberate drumming up of disease panic and forced distancing.
So let that sink in. They utterly smashed the world as we knew it — violating all human rights — in order to test out a new technology at great profit to themselves. In other words, they treated us all as lab rats.
An entire generation of politicians needs to be toppled from power all over the world. The same goes for media professionals, tech CEOs, and public-health officials. They all have to go. And we need a thorough accounting, not to mention guarantees, that nothing like this will ever happen again.
As for Moderna and Pfizer, one could easily make a case for forcing their immediate end as corporate entities.
Regards,
Jeffrey Tucker
for The Daily Reckoning
Thank you for taking the time to post this comment. It is most interesting.
The pleasure was all mine. Many thanks for ALL your books. Looking forward to the next one.
As an aside, in 1957 I was fifteen years old and caught a bad dose of Asian Flu, I have never had a dose of flu again.
Best to you and yours
Regards
Colin
Hello again, Doctor, hope you are in good health.
METABOLICAL BY Dr Robert Lustig. MD. MSL. I think he is on your/our side?
The following may also be of interest.
I. Accountability Part 1: Did Pfizer Interfere In The 2020 Election?
One of the complaints I hear most frequently from everyday Americans is, “Why is there no accountability?” It’s not a partisan complaint. It applies equally to Democrats and Republicans. And it’s not even a strictly political complaint. It has more to do with morals and ethics than with raw politics. The complaint has its origins in the fact that we are continually bombarded with stories about political wrongdoing and fraud. We know all about the 2016-2018 Russian hoax on Donald Trump. Why has no one gone to jail? We know how the 2020 election was rigged for Joe Biden in places like Phoenix, Atlanta and Philadelphia. Why was no one arrested for this election rigging? We have ample information about how Dr. Anthony Fauci paid the Chinese to develop the COVID virus in a weapons laboratory in Wuhan and how he covered his tracks once the engineered virus escaped. Why is he still a free man? The list goes on through the Green New Scam, how the U.S. triggered the War in Ukraine and many more egregious actions. The question is always the same: we know what happened, so why is there no accountability? The answer is that the first Trump administration had its hands tied by Russiagate and two phony impeachments and the Biden administration was in on the lies. For reasons of political gridlock and political connivance, the wrongdoers in these and other frauds have never been held to account. That may be about to change. Trump is back and this time his hands are not tied. He has hired a brilliant group of Cabinet officers and staff who have the skills needed to pursue prosecutions where appropriate. More importantly, they now have access to government information and have the resources needed to complete investigations and make criminal charges stick. The first major case has now emerged. Pfizer is well-known as the major pharmaceutical company that developed the experimental gene-modification therapy for COVID. It was called a “vaccine” but was not a true vaccine. It did not stop the spread of the disease and it did not prevent anyone from getting it. Pfizer insisted on legislation that held it harmless for any damages caused by the vaccine. But that indemnification does not apply to crimes not involving the vaccine itself. Now evidence has emerged that Pfizer tried to rig the 2020 election in favor of Joe Biden by not disclosing that the vaccine was ready until after the election, even though it was actually ready before Election Day. At least one witness has recorded these facts in writing and may be compelled to testify. A prosecution for election interference may be coming. There may be some accountability at last.
Is zero “innumerable”?
Dr M, I’m sure you will be aware of Thomas Seyfried. Seems simple common sense to inhibit the two main cancer fuels. Surely can’t do any harm by itself or in conjunction with some mainstream treatments?
I have met him twice and fully support his ideas.
On the question of are we flockers, or not ?
How many genes do we have in common/share with birds ?
1 – I really like the flock analogy – and will probably steal that at some future time. very applicable and easily visualized. Nice.
2 – To really understand what happened you need to know several things:
2.1 first that people like Fauci and Brix are at least 30 years out of date on whatever bits of science they picked up in school. Remember that the skills that get people to the top of agencies like the NIH develop in school and get applied there to getting high grades for minimal effort, so not only were they out of date, they were never that good to begin with.
2.2 second that these same “power players” were, and knew themselves to be, guilty of by-passing presidential executive orders (legally enforceable) going back to Bush II outlawing the kind the research their “friends” wanted funded. Having the outbreak traced to a lab accident meant, to them, possibly exposing their roles in funding the research while hiding it from American regulators (and potential whistleblowers) in China and the Ukraine.
2.3 the first info they had suggested a 50%+ mortality rate – dropping to about a 15% expectation in Dec 2019- before the President (and Boris Johnson in the UK) were formally briefed on the mess.
The expected death rate, combined with their knowledge of their own roles in this, and their lack of expertise led to panic. The panic led them to take actions they thought the media would approve of – i.e. they went with hollywood views on pandemics instead of the containment plans their own agencies had developed and adopted. That then forced them into the supression of contrary information.. and the rest we all know.
Whilst some hospitals went into lockdown for Covid in the west Midlands, they ‘locked out brain tumour patients’ like my husband to be nursed at home. I was completely unable to access tumour treatment for him in the Royal Marsden too, and nursed him at home until his death. I feel saddened and appreciate your article about the woes of Covid-19, for the many people who because of bias in the system had traumatic deaths as a consequence of a biased health system.
“people will look back on this time as one of total shame for academia.”
For years I’ve been advocating the Dissolution of the Universities despite, or perhaps partly because of, how much I enjoyed them in the Olden Days.
Hey ho: bulldozers and start again. After a gap. Of a few generations?
Let’s not throw baby out with the bath water !
Academia is a sympton of the mass idiocy but not necessarily the cause. We are still hamstrung by the policies of the lunatic left and WEF fifth columnists. The war criminal Tony Blair is the one who instigated the mad idea that everyone should have a degree and he and the Tories and Lib Dems were the ones that put the system in place that puts all graduates into massive debt whilst ensuring that hedge funds and University heads can make a financial killing on the back of the fees.
We need to revert to a system where University is for the dedicated few and not the many. We need to remove corporate funding and we need to ensure there are suitable alternatives available such as apprenticeships. And, maybe we need to abolish all PPL Political degree courses and enforce politicians to learn something useful and maybe relevant to running a modern parliament.
I know it’s a dream but we can hope …
Politicians? Learn something useful?? Phew, that’s a tall order!
An expert well worth everyone’s attention:
https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/statement-by-mike-yeadon
I’m sorry to hear that you have prostate cancer. I always read your blogs with great interest.
I was completely sceptical about ‘The Science’ but felt the social pressure to conform. I really regret having a Covid vaccine and I reject the calls by my GP to have boosters.
My formerly fit and healthy husband, who was never ill, had a very painful urinary infection within days of having one of the vaccines. Last year, at the age of 66, he was diagnosed with an aggressive grade 4 renal cancer with a brain metastasis. I can’t help but think there’s a connection.
All the greed mismanagement is human nature….but it doesn’t mean that it wasn’t a first salvo to the launch of the Omniwar. In Newsletter….It’s almost showtime for the Omniear Symposium – Saturday, April 26, at 9 am Eastern time. Be prepared for 5 hours of everything you need to know about the state of war against your brain.David A Hughes and others symposium, hosted by Catherine Austin-Fitts. Undoubtedly this requires real mental fortitude to investigate. Just look fir accuracy as truth is stranger than fiction. OʻWhy the brain? Because it is the pinnacle of humanness and the ultimate target of the anti-human forces of Technocracy and Transhumanism.Here are the places to pick up the live stream:WorldView Weekend – https://worldviewtube.com/Technocracy News – https://www.technocracy.news/the-brain/Solari Report – https://solari.com/Children's Health Defense – https://childrenshealthdefense.org/Rumble – https://rumble.com/user/TechnocracyNews (and others)X.com – https://x.com/stoptechnocracy (and others)YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@TechnocracyNewsTrends (and others)Patrick Wood, Author & LecturerTechnocracy News & TrendsFor The Study Group on Technology and PowerYes, everything will be recorded. After the event, we will post our slide decks and individual presentations on Technocracy.news
Dear Dr. Kendrick,
I was upset (though not surprised) to hear of your cancer diagnosis. I can’t help feeling however that the (and let’s be gracious here) lack of guile that led you to take the jab in the first place is still colouring your outlook on the Covid affair.
For instance,
* On what basis can you be so sure that Farrar is *categorically* a, “well-meaning man”?
* Does your ‘flock of birds’ analogy *really* explain why all the ‘tenth men’ (and – despite what you say – there were many of them around during the period) were systematically and ruthlessly censored and vilified worldwide?
* And does your explanation for how the Covid episode ‘panned out’ genuinely explain away…
a) …the fact that the public were invariably kept in the dark regarding every single one of the simple and inexpensive ways by which they could have optimized their immune systems to prepare for catching Covid (not to mention the fact that they were actually encouraged to take steps – e.g. stop exercising, become fearful, and stop getting vitamin D – that *impaired* their immune systems)?
b) …the various and profoundly evil ways the public were banned from accessing – and even knowing about – the effective prophylactics and treatments for Covid – including IVM, monoclonal antibodies, vitamin D, and HCQ+zinc? (Of course, the public were administered treatments in hospitals that *very* much appear to have been designed to kill as many of them as the ‘powers-that-be’ thought they could get away with. Does this honestly fit your stated worldview?)
c) …the mountains of evidence that the Covid affair was planned [1]?
d) …the various mysterious deaths – or disappearances – of people who enjoyed privileged access to key information (there were around 20 of these, beyond just Kary Mullis of PCR fame) [2]?
e) …the *scores* of highly convenient-looking deaths (including those of national leaders who refused to follow the narrative) that occurred during the ‘pandemic’ [3]?
In closing, I must say I consider it a most unfortunate misrepresentation to imply that all conspiracy theorists want you to shut up. What the bulk of us undoubtedly want is for you to think things through a little more fully, and to listen to our point of view a little less dismissively, before publishing statements on the question of a major conspiracy. Btw If you still can’t see how a global conspiracy could operate unmolested, here’s an article (it takes just 2 minutes to read) that sets out why it’s more than possible: fishily.net/inspired
SOURCES:
[1] https://fishily.net/planned
[2] https://fishily.net/privileged
[3] https://fishily.net/convenient
Very well said.
Huge thanks for your v encouraging message. I put quite a lot of time and thought into the post, so even though I wasn’t expecting a reply from Dr. K himself (based on past experience), I was hoping I’d hear from *someone*.
P.S. I’m guessing you might also like the follow-up post I submitted on the 12th :o)
FYI.
Full text: Covid-19 Prevention, Control and Origins Tracing: China’s Actions and Stance
By XinhuaPublished: Apr 30, 2025 03:27 PM
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202504/1333203.shtml
Of course, this is Chinese so a complete pack of lies, some might say – but is it ?
interesting read, you decide.
Left this on one side to savour at leisure. Not disappointed.
What’s really scary is that nothing has been learned. The official enquiry is a masquerade.
The intention was to whitewash, there was never any intention to learn. Oh, yes, before I forget, the lawyers and civil serpents needed some more work.
Looking forward to your thoughts (or even just one thought :oD) on my message above. In the meantime, does your theory explain why the mRNA jabs – at least – were intentionally designed to harm recipients (as explained in Dr. Mike Yeadon’s “Silver Bullet” video)?
I came late to this blog and I’m genuinely very upset at you developing cancer. It is a sod that someone as intelligent and decent as you, a man that has served public health practising ‘proper’ ethical medicine, whilst courageously challenging injustice and the entrenched dogma on the statin/ cholesterol issue, should end up having to endure this! Ironically I have just had a cancerous lesion removed and the problem we all face now is the uncertainty over whether any cancers we develop are a natural part of our aging process and genetic pre-destiny, or are they a product of gene therapy that was administered to us under the name of vaccine. Sad times.
Indeed. Then there are all the toxic substances in food.
More evidence that it was part of a bigger plot – “Lockdowns imposed in 2020 for covid were planned in 2005 for flu”
https://expose-news.com/2025/05/13/lockdowns-in-2020-were-planned-in-2005/
Hmm, Jeremy Farrar “He is obviously a very hard working and well-meaning man.” HArdworking no doubt at promoting disinformation and lies. Well-meaning? Well, as TOm Lehrer once said always be sincere even if you don’t meant it…
As to Wuhan they locked down we understand and the dreadful atmospheric pollution went, reducing respiratory disease. Clever people these Chinese.
As to all the shenigans over lockdowns etc it was all a cunning plan to wake people up to the scam of vaccines and virology and a whole lot more besides. A ‘let’s see who sees through the bullshit and who doesn’t’ exercise, a ‘who can spot the obvious clues’. There are still many who can only write their names on the exam paper.
You write : “Efficacy … say what? Did any of the efficacy trials demonstrate that any lives had been saved? No, they did not. The trials were not set up to measure this, what you might consider this, somewhat important, outcome.”
I am well aware of the limitations of the vaccine but, this cannot be true, I thought. But then I have been marvelling at your mental acuity for a couple of decades so I decided to see for myself. This is what I found on the Pfizer site : Primary efficacy analysis demonstrates BNT162b2 to be 95% effective against COVID-19 beginning 28 days after the first dose;170 confirmed cases of COVID-19 were evaluated, with 162 observed in the placebo group versus 8 in the vaccine group.
So they proved that, if vaccinated, one had less chance of being sick with COVID. But how many of those vaccinated and who were spared a COVID episode would have ended in hospital, how many would have died ? We will never know. Mon Dieu !!!
In 2019 there was the same problem as in 2008 – a credit crunch – an unsustainable amount of debt. Many public companies could not generate enough profit to cover interest payments and borrowed more to keep afloat. Lockdowns were imposed because financial markets were collapsing. They enabled suspension of business transactions and the need for credit was thereby reduced.
Lockdowns had nothing to do with ‘Covid’.
I really hope that everything is going well with you, Malcolm!
I hope that everything is going well with you, Malcolm!
There is a long time without new posts from you. Just hoping that everything is going well with you!
When we look at the lies by public health authorities, don’t they all, directly or indirectly, aim to spur acceptance of vaccines?